Né l’una né l’altra di queste due politiche assimilazioniste – l’una, quella italiana, implicitamente normativa ma poco articolata nel delineare nuove appartenenze possibili; l’altra, quella cinese, esplicitamente normativa e chiaramente espressa nei termini dell’appartenenza irrinunciabile alla nazione cinese – contempla esplicitamente e si pone come obiettivo la formazione di identità e di appartenenze plurime, duttili e in grado di conciliare le diverse anime di un retaggio linguistico-culturale complesso.
“The quest for leverage over the United States, furthermore, does not mean that China always seeks to undermine US interests in the region. On... Read More
As Germany and other member states of the European Union (EU) have gradually developed their own strategies for the emerging strategic space of the... Read More
The Indo-Pacific as a foreign-policy construct has reshaped how Asian regional space is both defined and governed. From a Southeast Asian perspective, its rise... Read More
This chapter examines how Japan perceives, encourages and instrumentalises the growing engagement of Italy, and of Europe more broadly, in the Indo-Pacific. Drawing comprehensively... Read More
This report examines the Netherlands’ Indo-Pacific approach following the adoption of its 2020 Indo-Pacific Guidelines and draws policy lessons for Italy. It argues that... Read More

Corso Valdocco 2, 10122 Torino, Italy
Sede legale: Galleria S. Federico 16, 10121 Torino
Copyright © 2026. Torino World Affairs Institute All rights reserved